The defendant pays 30,000,000 won to an applicant for compensation.

The above compensation order shall be.

On January 24, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of four months for fraud at the Suwon District Court for a period of one year, and the same year.

2. 1. The judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Fraud against victim D;

A. On October 20, 201, the Defendant: (a) at the office of the second floor F of the building in Suwon-si, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si; (b) the victim D, “A construction implementation project to create a flower complex on the front side of human movement; (c) the amount of civil engineering work is at least 36 billion won; and (d) the design drawing is at the end of November 201 and completed after obtaining permission at the end of the end of November 201; and (e) the construction work may begin from March 2012. The entire construction fund was prepared and the advance payment was to be reduced by 10%; and (e) the construction contract was to be executed at the beginning of the construction work, the amount of KRW 12 billion would be KRW 12 billion.

However, in fact, the above project for the creation and implementation of the flower complex was inadequate in the plan and did not have the ability to raise funds, and there was no actual progress, so the defendant did not have the intent or ability to cause the victim to perform the above civil works.

On October 21, 201, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 10 million from the victim, to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the Defendant.

B. On January 4, 2012, the Defendant concluded that “The Defendant, at the office of H Co., Ltd., a director who was a director in Kuung-gu G, Young-gu, Young-si, the Defendant, “I wish to construct an officetel in front of the orchard,” provided that “I will have the Defendant participate in the officetel construction if I lend KRW 10 million, and will complete payment after one week.”

However, the fact that the above officetel construction project is not a plan and does not have the ability to raise funds, and the defendant did not have any intent or ability to have the victim participate in the above construction project or to pay money.

On January 6, 2012, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 10 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the Defendant.