If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On December 30, 2014, the Defendant listened by the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D apartment 302 Dong 504 Dong and F on December 30, 2014, and the Defendant “G pastor moved to a hotel with the wind of HP by moving to his/her father, and the wind is known.

“.....”

However, the facts showed that the victim H and the husband of the defendant were not in a badial relationship.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim H by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. Entry of part of the witness H in the fourth public trial record;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Partial statement of the witness F;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A certificate of each fact of I and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to one of the Seoul Family Court rulings, such as a chairperson of the accusation, a group Kakao room course photograph and a photograph;

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 307 (2) of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment;

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, around January 2015, listens to the second floor “K” office in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government J building, and 4-5 staff such as F, etc., the Defendant is divorced.

“.....”

However, the facts showed that the victim H and the husband of the defendant were not in a badial relationship.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim H by openly pointing out false facts.

2. Determination: (a) around January 2015, the Defendant made a statement to the effect that the said statement was made from the Defendant at the K Office in the presence of L, M, N, andO, and (b) around January 2015, the Defendant stated to the effect that the said statement was made; (c) however, the investigative agency did not have any of the above contents from the Defendant “3-4 around March 2015,” which is the date of the previous charge of the change, at the time of the change.

the statement.