beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.14 2015고단1839

공무집행방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A group of persons with disabilities, such as the National Elimination of Elimination of Discrimination for Persons with Disabilities (hereinafter referred to as the "former Elimination") is called a group of persons with severe disabilities who died on June 1, 2014, by subrogation of funeral joint countermeasures committee for the deceased B (hereinafter referred to as the "joint countermeasures committee for funeral of the deceased").

(i) constituted the “Act”.

On June 3, 2014, from around 19:25 to 21:05 of the same day, the Defendant took part in the events of “accident B’s trend and accident C49”, which were taken place in the luminous plaza located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, with 130 members, etc. of funeral subrogation, and then, the Defendant tried to stop driving along the crosswalk from around 21:20 on the front day to the front day by using the vehicular road.

However, as the police officers belonging to the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency 3 Dong-dong Police Agency were proposed by police officers belonging to the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency, five lanes have been occupied from the broad language to the Sejong Metropolitan Police Agency, and even though the director of the Seoul metropolitan Police Agency requested voluntary dispersion and dispersion order against the funeral and subrogation members occupying the road, police officers were required to move the funeral subrogation members, etc. who occupied the road to the delivery.

At around 21:30 on the same day, the Defendant took measures to move to India a funeral subrogation member who was occupying the road as above, and her hand went back from the back of the victim H, a police officer belonging to the above G, and her hand flicked the victim H’s flick, and the victim I, a police officer belonging to the above G, who observed the above act of the Defendant, arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the obstruction of performance of official duties, and she went up with the victim I’s bridge.

Accordingly, the defendant is the victim H and I.