Nos. 5 and 20 shall be returned to each victim's name in default.

The defendant, through the Internet small-sum settlement agency, made a small-sum settlement through a mobile phone number, paid 40% of the settlement amount of the small-sum settlement amount to the relevant business entity under the name of the fee, and received and commercialized the remainder to the defendant's account, with the knowledge that there was a method of stealing the mobile phone, confirmed the information on the mobile phone, and raised the cash by making the payment through the above website.

1. A theft Defendant: (a) around 05:00 on the first day of February 2015, the victim E (23 years of age) was stolen from the point of soup, so that the victim E (23 years of age) was drying a mobile phone on the side of the mobile phone at the time when the victim’s ownership price was 1,00,000 won.

3. Until December 21, 200, the total amount of damage 1,3530,000 won was stolen on a total of 16 occasions, as shown in Appendix 1.

2. Around March 16:11, 2015, the Defendant: (a) informed the G-U.S.-U. M.-U.K.’s mobile phone information (H’s date of birth, Google ID, cell phone subscription radio operator, etc.) on the mobile phone in the H’s name that he/she stolen to a counselor on the G-U.S.-U. M.’s (the date of birth, Google ID, cell phone subscription radio operator, etc.) that he/she had been aware of the fact that he/she had been aware of the fact that he/she had been aware of the fact that he/she was aware of the fact that he/she had the victim (the victim) case by accessing the G-U.S. website’s website and then had a small amount of 298,500 won paid for goods by entering an improper order in the data processing device, such as a computer, etc. from March 21, 2015 to 30,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police officer against I, J, K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, R, and S.