2. That the Defendant’s judgment is contrary to and does not repeat the crime

The fact that there is a difference between the victim and the victim, and the fact that the victim has reached an agreement with three victims, and that the 28 victims have reached an agreement with 15 victims, or that the deposit is made for the victim, is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, even though the defendant had been punished due to fraud, etc., he committed the crime of this case again while being tried at the court of the court below, and again committed each of the crimes of this case again even while being tried at the court of the court below, and there is a high possibility of criticism, such as being absent on the trial date without justifiable grounds. The crime of fraud among the crimes of this case uses the nature of the Internet site which does not face face with the other party, and thus, it is more serious damage to the distribution order of electronic commerce, and it is necessary to severely punish the whole society as it promotes the unrefluence of society

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, and circumstances after the instant crime, etc., as well as the various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.