2. Although it is recognized that the defendant's time to commit the crime of this case and reflects the wrongness of the defendant, the crime of this case is deemed to have embezzled money repeatedly for a considerable period of time in relation to his duties, and the nature of the crime is not good, the amount of embezzlement is not specified, and it cannot be seen that he made a serious effort to recover from damage. In full view of all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is deemed to be appropriate, and it is not recognized that the defendant's sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable. Thus,

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.