A. At around 15:24, June 3, 2014, Defendant A posted a statement stating that “The victim D received orders from the applicants for the joint purchase of children’s goods at the Darog Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Karo Kao Kao Karo Kao, and the said company received orders from the applicants for the joint purchase of the goods for children’s use, and ordered the said company to make the final product orders to the head office of the Karo Karo Karo Karo Ga, the said company deposited after the orders to the head office of the Karo Doro Doro Kawa.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by divulging public false information through information and communication network with a view to slandering the person.

B. At around 11:35 on June 5, 2014, Defendant B posted a letter stating that “The victim D deposited orders from the applicants for the purchase of infant goods at a Kawa Construction website (F)” (hereinafter “F”) while operating the Internet site, and even though the said company deposited the orders to the head office of Gawa Construction and ordered the said company to place the final order to the Gawa Construction, the said 40 purchaser of the said product at the above Gawa Construction, the Defendant reported that the 40 purchaser of the said product at the above Gawa was reported to the above Gawa Construction, the Defendant posted a letter stating that “The Green Cross did not have promised to supply the said goods orally, and there was no money deposited at 10 won.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by divulging public false information through information and communication network with a view to slandering the person.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, it is recognized that the Defendants posted the comments written in each of the facts charged on the hosting room.

B. Furthermore, the Defendants stated in the above bulletin.