2. The defendant made a statement to the effect that he had defended by putting the victim’s flab at the time of the police investigation (the 6th page of the investigation record). This can be viewed as a confession statement of the defendant in accordance with the contents of the above facts charged. However, there is no evidence to reinforce the above confession (the victim only made a statement to the purport that she was inserted by the defendant in this court and investigative agency, and there is no statement stating that she was flabing, and only is the material supporting the victim’s statement that all flabing the victim’s flabs, such as a photographic photo (50 pages of investigation record) and the injury diagnosis report submitted by the victim, medical records, etc.). The above confession cannot be viewed as evidence unfavorable to the defendant as evidence of guilt.

Ultimately, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, is acquitted pursuant to the latter part of Article 325.