In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

피고인들은 2016. 5. 24. 23:05경 서울 송파구 C빌딩 1층 남자화장실에서, 피고인 A가 화장실 문을 열어둔 채 들어왔다는 이유로 피해자 D(29세), E(34세)과 말다툼을 하다가, 피해자 D로부터 머리로 얼굴을 들이받히고 멱살을 잡히고 주먹으로 얼굴을 2~3회 맞는 등 폭행을 당하고, 피해자 E으로부터 주먹으로 얼굴을 2회 맞는 등 폭행을 당하게 되자, 피고인 B는 주먹으로 피해자 E의 얼굴을 2회 때리고, 발로 피해자 D의 몸통을 1회 걷어차고, 피고인 A는 이에 합세하여 주먹으로 피해자 D의 얼굴을 1회 때리고 발로 다리를 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants and D’ respective legal statements

1. Application of each police interrogation protocol to Defendants, D, and E

1. The Defendants: Article 2 (2) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 260 (1) of the same Act, the selection of fines

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The victims of the reasons for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, who first go to the Defendant A in advance, resulting in the instant crime; the victim D does not want punishment against Defendant A; the Defendants recognized all the crimes in this court; and Defendant A has no criminal records beyond the force of violence or suspended execution, in favor of the Defendants.

On the other hand, in comparison with the degree of violence used by the victims to the defendants, the degree of violence used by the defendants A is not less and less (the defendant A voluntarily stated that he was more and more at the investigative agency) and the defendant B was able to be sentenced to suspension of execution and punishment for the crime of violence, but the crime of this case is committed.