When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Around 2012, at a place where the location of the Defendant is unknown, the Defendant called “C” to the place where the Defendant is unknown, “Isma in Japan, which is well known, and Isma, and Isma a set of money. Isma, with a set of money.” D, “Ise a short-term amount of money at a commercial entertainment business establishment located in the part of a day, Ise a day. Ise a day.” The Defendant called “Ise a set of money at a commercial entertainment business establishment which is located in the part of a day. Ise a part of a day, with a set of three months of tourist travel and for work at a commercial entertainment business establishment, Ise a set of money. Isman a set of money.” The Defendant called “Isma in Japan once.”

Therefore, the Defendant introduced C, E by directly introducing C, and E by allowing E to transmit D’s pictures to I, while allowing C, D, and E to work as sexual traffic women in the above businesses, at a restaurant where it is impossible to know the trade name located in the Hannam Park in August 2012, 201, G 1101 in G 1101 in Japan, which is located in F, east, Japan, and the name of “H”.

Accordingly, the defendant introduced and arranged a job to sell sex.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement made by C of a witness in the third protocol of trial;

1. The witness I's partial statement in the fifth trial record;

1. Partial statements made by witnesses D in the sixth trial records;

1. A protocol of examination of part of the defendant by prosecution;

1. Application of the police interrogation protocol to E;

1. Article 19 (1) 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. At the request of the J, the defendant asked E whether he would work in Japan, but he refused to do so.