beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.05.14 2013고정254

도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of C Freight Vehicles.

On December 4, 2012, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 19:50, while driving the vehicle, and continued to drive the front road of the wood station located in the Southern-dong, Gwangju Mine-gu, using three lanes from the front intersection to the seat of the new hospital.

A person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely operate the steering boat by accurately operating the steering boat and brake system.

Nevertheless, the pedestrian signal, etc. owned by the mining police station, which was installed in India due to negligence of neglecting this, and Bolarlard (bllar): An obstacle installed to prevent the entry of a motor vehicle on a road for pedestrians or on the blurd, which is the pillar shape or concrete of the ordinary steel system. B was shocked with the front part of the motor vehicle of the defendant.

Ultimately, in the event of a traffic accident that damages the traffic signal etc. to the extent equivalent to KRW 2,531,220 due to the above occupational negligence of the defendant, the defendant immediately stopped and did not take measures necessary to confirm the degree of damage and ensure the prevention of danger and smooth traffic flow.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witness D and each legal statement of E;

1. A traffic accident report (1) - a survey report, (2) - a map at the scene of the accident, and evidence and photographs of the scene;

1. Application of each written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Determination on the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of the workhouse

1. The alleged defendant recognized the fact that he caused a traffic accident as stated in the facts of the crime, but after the accident, the 119 members of the accident management committee and the leker article were in charge of the accident management, called the wife and reported the insurance to the wife, and the cellular phone is located at the site.