However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Although the Defendant was the victim B (the age of 44) and the legal couple who completed the marriage report on February 24, 2011, the relationship with the victim was aggravated from around April 2017, and the dispute remains, and the victim applied for divorce on or around May 19, 2017, and the victim applied for divorce with the Defendant on or around August 31, 2017, and the withdrawal of divorce was terminated on or around August 31, 2017, and the victim filed a divorce lawsuit with the Incheon Family Court at the end on or around October 27, 2017, and the above case was transferred to the Gwangju Family Court on or around June 7, 2018, and then the conciliation was established and divorced at present.

On the other hand, at the time of the instant divorce, the victim was aware that the defendant was intending to sell the Gyeyang-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C Apartment D, the joint property of the couple registered in his name, and around August 1, 2017, a provisional disposition registration had been made for the right to claim property division due to divorce as the right to preserve the said apartment upon the application of the victim.

Accordingly, when it is anticipated that the Defendant would be subject to compulsory execution against the above apartment based on the right to claim division of property from the victim in the future, the Defendant suggested the victim to temporarily separate land and sell the above apartment on the condition of evading it, and the victim respondeded to this, to cancel the provisional disposition registration around August 7, 2017, and then sold the above apartment to a third party on or around August 8, 2017, and received 200 million won from the purchaser as cash and checks. Since then, the Defendant did not inform the victim of the location of the purchase price and the address of the place of residence in the future, and did not inform the victim of the purchase price without any settlement of the settlement of the purchase price, and concealed the purchase price from the time to the time of the above divorce by making it clear the location of the purchase price, such as not disclosing the location of the purchase price from the time until

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning B;

1. The police in relation to B.