A. On June 23, 2014, the Plaintiff is the ownership holder who completed the registration of transfer of ownership on the ground of exchange on June 10, 2014 with respect to C forest land 287 square meters (hereinafter “instant forest”).

B. The Defendant is an owner of the instant land 968 square meters, E prior to 1,181 square meters, and F land for a factory with a capacity of 332 square meters, which is the neighboring land of the instant forest.

C. Of the forest land in this case, the Defendant is obliged to occupy the part of the instant land owned by the Defendant (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Defendant’s land-related premises”) in order to connect each point of 12, 13, 14, 15, and 12 on the ground surface with the indication of the attached drawing among the forest land in this case, such as a bar board with the indication of 16, 17, 18, 19, 16, 19, 16, 19, 200 square meters on the ground surface of 4m2,20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 20, and 24m2 of the same drawing, which connect each point of 24m2, in line with the indication of the attached drawing(f), one outdoor light pole with the indication of the same drawing(g), one pipe on the ground in this case, 2,12, 13, 4, 25, 219 or 37m2.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 5, and 6 (including the number of branch offices), the result of the appraisal commission to the Jind branch offices of the Korea Land Information Corporation, the purport of the entire pleadings

2. According to the reasoning of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, the Defendant, who owned the instant forest owned by the Plaintiff and occupied the instant dispute part, thereby obstructing the Plaintiff’s exercise of ownership, removed or removed the goods owned by the Defendant, barring any special circumstance, to the Plaintiff who claimed the obstruction removal and the return of owned property based on the ownership of the instant forest land.