beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 거창지원 2017.10.25 2017고단242

도로법위반

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that A, the accused of the Defendant, operated B cargo cars in violation of the Defendant’s business-related ceiling weight on June 30, 199 and around 05:42 on June 30, 199.

2. Determination

A. The prosecutor prosecuted the above charged facts by applying Articles 86 and 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005).

B. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 193; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 4920, Jun. 1, 1993); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832, Dec. 30; Act No. 7832, Dec. 10, 2005; Act No. 8497, Mar. 21, 2008; Act No. 945, Apr. 1, 2005; Act No. 9777, Mar. 19, 2005)

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant shall be acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment shall not be publicly announced pursuant to the proviso of Article 58 (1) of the Criminal Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.