Based on its stated reasoning, the lower court reversed the judgment of the first instance that found the Defendant guilty on July 24, 2013 of the facts charged in the instant case on the ground that there was no proof of crime, and sentenced the Defendant not guilty.

Examining the record, the above judgment of the court below is just, and there is no violation of law of logic and experience beyond the limit of the principle of free evaluation of evidence.

Meanwhile, although the prosecutor appealed to the entire judgment of the court below, the remaining guilty portion is not indicated in the petition of appeal or the appellate brief.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.