beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.05.11 2015고단1032

정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc.;

A. On April 6, 2013, the Defendant committed a verbal sexual harassment at the Defendant’s home located in Yongsan-gu Seoul on April 6, 2013, at around 14:01, and following Ara (htp: /agora. Media. d.e.) bulletin board, “D” under the title “D”.

F(33) The FC was a minor.

He has committed a verbal sexual harassment against the author.

F The words of speech sexual harassment that FC had done to the author are such.

How to cover the inner packer, “I,” you do not know how sexual assault would be done.

Articles also Security Does

any person who has been aware of his or her reputation, not any person who is subject to the test, but any person who is aware of his or her reputation.

“Ap.” refers to whether a man has a permanent domicile;

The phrase “I am kel,” “I am kel kele,” even if I am young only several years. I am kel. I am kel.

(B) A notice was posted with the content of “afterward.”

However, there was no fact that the victim F provided this f to the defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant abused the victim's reputation by disclosing false information through information and communications networks with a view to slandering the victim.

B. On April 8, 2013, the Defendant, at around 01:15, on April 8, 2013, posted the same article as Paragraph (a) by accessing the Defendant’s home on the NAT G bulletin from the Defendant’s home to the NAT G bulletin.

However, there was no fact that the victim F provided this f to the defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant abused the victim's reputation by disclosing false information through information and communications networks with a view to slandering the victim.

(c)

On December 13, 2013, the Defendant went to the victim on December 13, 2013, using the Defendant’s e-mail (H) at the Defendant’s home indicated in paragraph (a) around December 13, 2013.