Around 11:00 on January 3, 2014, the Defendant was at the construction site located in Friju-si C, located in Friju-si, and caused injury to the victim, i.e., the left-hand snow, head, and left-hand part of the victim's snow, hair, and internal wall that require approximately eight weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. The Defendant asserts to the effect that the determination of the pertinent legal provision on the crime, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the Defendant’s assertion of the Defendant’s choice of imprisonment with prison labor was an assaulting the victim by taking head from the victim and neglecting to check this, which constitutes legitimate self-defense or legitimate act.

In light of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, the illegality cannot be determined in view of the act of defense or legitimate act against the present unfair infringement, since the victim and the defendant were in conflict with each other, and the defendant was at drinking prices, and thus, the illegality cannot be determined.

This part of the defendant's assertion is without merit.

The reason for sentencing [the range of recommendations] General Injury (the range of general injury) is that the injury (the 1, 4th sentence) serious (the 6 to 2 years) (the 1, 4th sentence) serious (the 1, 4th sentence decision) is the circumstance favorable to the defendant.

Provided, That it shall be sentenced as the disposition in consideration of the fact that the victim's damage, such as the cutting of the frame and the cutting of the frame of the internal wall, is not easy, and that it is not agreed with the victim.