1. At around 14:55 on March 4, 2016, the Defendant insultd the victim at the H market I station located in Busan metropolitan Daegu metropolitan G, the Defendant reported 112 by J, thereby finding the Defendant who was working in the marine transportation police station, and called “the Defendant,” and “the Defendant discovered the Defendant who was working in the street urine in front of the toilets in the market, and using the front shopping toilets” at the location of people, including M, N, etc., saying, “the Defendant publicly insulting the victim, who was working in the marine transportation station, who was working in the marine transportation station, with the Defendant’s 112 report.”

2. 공용 물건 손상 피고인은 2016. 3. 4. 17:55 경 부산 해운대구 재송 1동에 있는 해운대 경찰서 형 사과 사무실에서, 제 1 항의 이유로 현행범인 체포되어 형사 과로 인치된 후, 당직근무 중인 경찰관들 앞에서 욕을 하면서 갑자기 창문 쪽으로 뛰어가 머리를 들이 박는 행동을 하여 그 곳 복도에 설치되어 있는 조사실 칸막이 3개를 부쉈다.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the use of goods by public offices, thereby harming their utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement with respect to L;

1. A written statement of theO;

1. Investigation report- The application of Acts and subordinate statutes that attach photographs to damaged public goods (a partition);

1. Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes [the scope of recommendations] The reason for sentencing under Article 38(1)2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes / [the scope of recommendations] Class 1 (the invalidation of public goods) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes / [a person specially mitigated] In a case where the value of an article invalidated or destroyed is minor, the sentencing guidelines are concurrent crimes with the offense of insult for which no sentencing guidelines have been established. As such, only the lower limit of the above sentence range should be considered [whether probation is suspended] - Major reasons for concurrent crimes of the same kind (a person who has been subject to suspended sentence for not more than five