2. The crime of this case, along with a false lease contract, interferes with auction by means of reporting the right to the auction court and applying for demand for distribution, and the crime is not less than the nature of the crime because it committed the attempted crime by deceiving the money, and considering the fact that the defendant provided two children as the primary offender, the court below sentenced the fine reduced by the fine in the summary order, and taking into account the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment, circumstances of the crime and the result, all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments of this case, including the records and arguments of this case, even though considering that the defendant is against the defendant, it does not seem that the sentence of the court below is unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.