분양대금반환등
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation in this case is as follows: (a) each of the “witnesss” in the first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s second instance court’s second instance court’s second instance court’s second instance court’s second instance court’s second instance court’s second instance court’s second instance court’s second instance court’s second instance court’s second instance court’s second instance court’s second instance court’s
2. Additional determination
A. The plaintiff's assertion is based on the premise that the defendant made false or exaggerated advertisements (specific contents from 5th to 6th 9th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth e) in the process of concluding the contract
(1) No business operator, etc. shall place any of the following acts likely to undermine fair trade order, which are labeling or advertising by deceiving or misleading consumers, or cause other business operators, etc. to do so:
1. False or exaggerated labeling or advertising. (2) Details of the acts referred to in the subparagraphs of paragraph (1) shall be prescribed by Presidential Decree;
Article 10 (Liability for Damages) (1) Where any person has suffered damage due to unfair labeling or advertising in violation of Article 3 (1), business entities, etc. shall be liable to compensate such damage to the victim.
(1) False or exaggerated labeling or advertising referred to in Article 3 (1) 1 of the Act on Fair Labeling and Advertising shall be placed or advertised differently from the fact, or excessively exaggerated labeling or advertising.
B. Relevant statutes
C. Determination Doesck;