If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The Defendant is a person who operates a subdivision of “D” in No. 101 of the first floor of the commercial building in Mabi-si. C.

Enforcement Officers E, with the delegation of the enforcement of the creditor F, may not perform the collection and operation in the name of G in the name of D division house around August 5, 2015, when the prohibition of competition 2015Kahap 49 of the above court is based on the original disposition, from August 5, 2015.

“The competitive prohibition was attached to the notice of the disposition execution.”

Nevertheless, on August 23, 2015, the Defendant made it effective by attaching a white paper A4 on the notice of execution on August 23, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A complaint;

1. A copy of a decision on the disposition of prohibition of competition business;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Submission of photographs containing the publicly announced doors by the complainants), investigation reports (to hear statements by telephone from the staff of the execution officer, the office of the execution officer, etc.);

1. Article 140 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 140 (1) of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.