For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court acquitted Defendant A on the ground that there was no proof of a crime regarding the following facts: (a) the number 4, 12, and 13 of the daily list of crimes committed against Defendant A among the facts charged in the instant case; (b) the number 4, 12, and 13 of the daily list of crimes committed against Defendant B as indicated in the lower judgment; (c) the number 4, 12, and 13 of the daily list of crimes committed against Defendant B; and (d) the child school representative on April 1

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the record, the above determination by the court below is just, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there is no error of law by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.