When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who operates a marina business with the trade name called “D” in the B building C in the period of harmony.

From February 2, 2019 to February 16, 2019, the Defendant received KRW 80,00 to KRW 120,00 from male customers at the foregoing business establishment, and had E, a female employee, take the sexual organ of male customers in his/her hand and have them do the act of similarity, thereby arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statements of E;

1. Defendant Kakakao conversation and recording file recording [First, the Defendant and his defense counsel claimed to the effect that the public prosecution of this case should be dismissed since the specific date and time of arranging sexual traffic and important parts of the parties to sexual traffic are not specified in the facts charged of this case. The purport of the law that specifies the facts charged is to limit the scope of defense against the court and to facilitate the exercise of defense by specifying the scope of defense against the Defendant. As such, the facts charged are sufficient if it is stated to the extent that it can distinguish the facts from other facts in light of these elements, and even if the date, time, place, method, etc. of the crime are not indicated in the indictment, it does not go against the purport of the law that allows the Defendant to specify the facts charged as above (see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 2002Do807, Jun. 20, 201). The facts charged of this case was obtained from the Defendant from February 20, 2019 to his/her temporary acts of arranging sexual traffic, etc. to his/her employees.