When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

In spite of the fact that the Defendant was unable to operate a road, the Defendant operated 4 times as shown in the attached Form Do in the absence of mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Compacting the non-insurance running cars;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing compulsory insurance contracts;

1. Articles 46 (2) and 8 of the former Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (amended by Act No. 11369, Feb. 22, 2012) applicable to criminal facts

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (the amount of fine prescribed by the summary order shall not be excessive even if considering the ownership relationship of the instant vehicle and the frequency of each crime, etc. of the Defendant’s health, etc.)