However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 6, 2017, around 21:55, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the Defendant and the Defendant’s Defendant on “C” on the 3rd floor of the Busan B building, and filed a report on the 112 degree of vision with D operating the said frequency of the road; (b) the slopeF, etc. belonging to the Busan Coastal Police Station E District Team, dispatched to the Defendant; and (c) the Defendant was the prosecutor of the said F, “C. v. N. F. F.

“At the same time, assaulted the F’s body with the Defendant’s body.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties by police officers who handle the 112 reported dispatch work.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (which has no record of committing the same type of crime, and reflects the depth of the crime) [Scope of recommended punishment] There is no person who has no basic area (from June to one year and six months) (person who is subject to special sentencing) (the person who is subject to special sentencing] (the decision of sentence] under the basic area (from June to one year and six months) (the decision of sentence), and one year of suspended execution;