beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.12.06 2017고단2828

업무방해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant of “2:40 on July 8, 2017, 2828”, from around July 22:40, 2017 to around 01:40 on the following day, to the customer who provided meals in the table table in the C cafeteria located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, hereinafter referred to as “Is to go to the public.”

‘Nameed’, ? ‘Nameed’

“Along with the absence of money from the victim D (the 39 years of age) to pay money to the foreign customer, the victim D (the 39 years of age) who flicks the horses, and wanting to do so while coming to the foreign customer, and the flicks are different, and the flicks are changed, “the president of the flicks shall do so,” “the flicks president of the flicks,” and “the flicks of the flicks

“Along with the noise,” the noise interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force.

2. “The Defendant, at the F convenience store located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around August 16, 2017, at around 05:20 on August 16, 2017, the Defendant, “2017 Height 3042,” the victim G, an employee of which, “the victim G, drinks alcohol from the convenience store table to the Defendant during the new wall hours.”

For the reason that he had the character of an article, he knows that "the president who lives with this disease, lives with it, and slicks with the same disease as the slicker" is a large strush.

Along five minutes of disturbance, such as taking a bath, interfered with the victim's convenience store business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement [2017 order 2828];

1. Written Statement (D) (2017 Height 3042);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Based on the grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the sentencing conditions specified in the trial process of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, family relation, family relationship, home environment, motive and means of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the sentence is determined as ordered.

The favorable circumstances: A confession and reflect on each of the crimes in this case.

The degree of interference with the work is severe.