사기등
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.
However, as to the Defendants, it shall be for 2 years from the date of each judgment.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant of "2013 Highest 2040", along with D and the person in poor name, has forged the apartment charter contract with respect to 126 dong 2105, Guro-gu, Seoul, Seoul, and has passed a resolution to acquire loans from the victim (owner)F of the Credit Business chain as security after forging the apartment charter contract with respect to 126 dong 2105, Guro-gu, Seoul, and D has decided to take charge of misrepresenting the owner of the apartment, who is the owner of the apartment and the tenant.
1. On March 28, 2013, the Defendant forged private documents, along with D and non-known names, entered the location column of the apartment charter contract form in the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government HI Licensed Real Estate Agent Office, “Seoul Metropolitan Government E Apartment 126 Dong 2105,” “No. 200,000,000” in the deposit column, “No. 24 months from February 20, 2013 to February 19, 2015” in the term column, “No. 2013 and February 20, 2015” in the date of preparation; “No. 1 Dong205, Seoul Metropolitan City, J apartment 1 Dong 205” in the lessor’s address column; “K in the lessor’s resident number column; L in the lessor’s telephone column; and “G’s name column” and affixed a seal in advance.
As a result, the Defendant forged one copy of the apartment lease contract in the name of G, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, without authority, for the purpose of uttering in collusion with D and person in poor name.
2. Uttering a falsified investigation document;
A. On March 28, 2013, the Defendant conspiredd with D and the person in poor name, and obtained a fixed date in the lease contract from the Guro-gu Seoul District Court, Guro-gu Seoul District Court, Guro-gu, Seoul District Court (hereinafter “Seoul District Court”) registry, and exercised the registered apartment lease contract as in the foregoing paragraph (1) by delivering it to the employee who was unaware of the forgery as if it was a document duly formed.
B. On April 3, 2013, the Defendant, in collusion with D and person in secret name, entered into a loan contract at the homeF office of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government M&A on April 3, 2013, and concluded a forged apartment lease contract as stated in the foregoing paragraph (1).