2. The grounds for this part of the allegations by the parties are the same as the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except that the grounds for this part are the same as that for the dismissal of “under accordance with” under the 6th or 11th of the grounds of appeal. Therefore, this part of the grounds are cited under the main sentence of Article 420

3. The reasoning for this part of the judgment is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts, and thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The 10th of the first instance judgment’s 11th of the 11st instance judgment is regarded as “uncomfortable fraud”.

B. Next, the 10th 13th 10th 13th 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance (“the 149,150,390 won is the aggregate of the amounts claimed by the Plaintiff only to offset the amount of damages, the amount of the automatic claim to offset, or the specific causes for the offset, and the amount claimed not to be deducted from the loan or the loan from the preparatory documents submitted by the Plaintiff, and the amount claimed by K was reduced by 465,470,260 won based on the principal amount from the amount claimed by K at the second 365,470,260. The Defendant Union and the law firm calculates the amount of damages of the Defendant association before the date of first 354,40,840 won was calculated, and most of the attorneys-at-law belonging to the law firm N in the first 3rd 1st 2nd 2nd mediation date were dismissed from the Plaintiff’s attorney and participated by the law firm-affiliated attorney

C. The “reduction to 70%” of the 10th judgment of the first instance court as “reduction to 50%”.

C. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff, according to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance No. 10, as follows.