However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

No person shall provide game products for distribution or use, the contents of which are different from those of the rating, or display or keep such products for such purposes.

On August 12, 2013, from around August 12, 2013 to around the 19th day of the same month, the Defendant installed 40 game machine “SEA Cannon 2 (Choon 2)”, which was rated as pure ability game as being unable to obtain high points by means of simple operations or external devices, such as where he puts waste into a game machine, starts game with points after he puts it into the game machine, and sets up various kinds of water height devices appearing on the screen using plastic instruments.

However, unlike the contents classified as above, the Defendant changed the 40 game machine to add additional points to the game machine user's ability without relation to the background image and the screen, and provided it to the customer who found the game machine.

As a result, the defendant provided game products different from the rating contents to customers for use.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement in F and G preparation;

1. On-site photographs;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. Investigation reports (attached a letter of results of the Game Rating Board);

1. A criminal investigation report (Attachment to a game description);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting internal investigation;

1. Relevant Article of the facts constituting a crime and subparagraph 4 of Article 45 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Selection of Punishment and Promotion of Game Industry;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution ( normal consideration of the reasons for the suspension of execution);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act as well as the social harm caused by illegal games with the reason of sentencing is serious and the necessity of strict punishment is high, and the crime of this case by the defendant is provided for the use of a game with contents different from the rated game, and the nature of the crime is not weak.

(b).