업무방해등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
1. Definite Defendant: (a) around March 28, 2018, within the “D convenience store” located in Young-gu, Young-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si; (b) the victim E, an employee of the said convenience store, “the value of the envelope” is KRW 20 won.
“The victim shall hear the horses of “,” and at the place where the F, the birth of the victim, known to the victim, is seen by the victim,” this garbage, weather, and bags are not garbage, but sludge, flab, flab, and flab
The president is well aware of the same kind of body, and it can be abandoned well. "Publicly insulting the victim."
2. At the time, at the time, at the time, and place specified in the above paragraph (a) above, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim’s desire to do so; and (b) “The victim, while coming out of convenience points and outside several times,” “A 20 minutes of the disturbance, such as the victim’s speech, etc., interfered with the victim’s convenience store business by force by avoiding the disturbance between about 20 minutes.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Legal statement of witness E;
1. A written statement;
1. A report on internal investigation:
1. The chief of the accusation (the defendant and his defense counsel have expressed a desire at the above convenience store once as stated in paragraph 1 of the facts charged, but when the defendant visited the above convenience store 2 to 3 times, he did not take a bath or disturbance, and the defendant did not do so at all at the time of visiting the convenience store, and the victim had no guest at the time of visiting the defendant and was easy to do so, so does not constitute obstruction of duties under the Criminal Act.
The argument is asserted.
However, according to each of the above evidence, the defendant found the above convenience point while under the influence of alcohol and found the above convenience point more than three times as stated in paragraph (1) of the facts charged, and it can be recognized that the victim "n't n't n't n't n't n't n't n't n't, or that the defendant's above act constitutes "power" of interference with business affairs.
B. ASEAN has to arrange warehouse as appropriate for the new wall time zone, but it has not been one of the defendants due to the defendant.
“.....”