A. The defendants (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months, 2 years of suspended sentence, 10 months of suspended sentence, 2 years of suspended sentence, 3 years of suspended sentence, 1 year of imprisonment with prison labor for 1 year and 2 months of suspended sentence) are too unreasonable.

B. Prosecutor 1) misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles made it difficult for Defendant A to find a criminal defendant by consistently asserting that he/she is a "bab president" and consistently stated the details of the purchase of a game machine and making it difficult to find a criminal defendant. As such, Defendant A should be deemed to have committed the crime of capital flight as stated in this part of the facts charged. 2) The sentence of the lower court of unfair sentencing (Defendant A: six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, etc., Defendant B: Defendant B: 10 months of imprisonment, ten months of suspended sentence, two years of suspended sentence, etc., and Defendant C’s imprisonment, one year and two months

2. Determination

A. On December 31, 2018, Defendant A made a false confession to the purport that, as stated in the facts charged in the case of “2019Da528,” Defendant A merely lent the name to B and C, and the unemployment of the game room is B and C, Defendant A made an investigation into the police officer in charge at the investigation of Gangnam Police Station and the economic2 team office as a suspect for the violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act, and purchased the game work at the end of September 2018. The lower court made a false confession to the effect that “I was the unemployed of F. I discovered the game work at the place of I, I, and purchased the game work at the end of September 2018,” and that “On February 21, 2019, the Prosecutor was investigated as the suspect in charge at the Gangwon District Public Prosecutor’s Office of Gangwon Branch Office of 402, who actually operated the game room F, on the ground that the Defendant actually committed the act constitutes a crime of escape in cash, and that the Defendant committed a false confession.”