except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around July 2011, the criminal defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the effect that “If he/she lends money, he/she would pay the money to the victim C through a work partner F, working in the office of the Dong-si, Ansan-si, Ansan-si.”

However, even if the Defendant received money from the victim, it was merely intended to use the Defendant’s bond interest and repayment, etc. at the time, and in fact, the Defendant did not intend to pay the profit by play for the number of days to the same article as the victim promised.

On July 13, 201, the Defendant received 925,000 won in total from the victim via the new cooperation passbook (Account Number G) opened in the name of the Defendant on July 13, 201, and received KRW 20,775,000 in total from around that time to June 21, 2012 as shown in the annexed Crime List (1).

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim and 20,775,000 won in total.

2. Around August 30, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “If he/she lends money to the victim F at the office of the taxi company office of the said State (E) taxi company, he/she would pay the victim F with interest income by playing his/her number of days for the taxi articles.”

However, even if the Defendant received money from the victim, it was merely intended to use the Defendant’s bond interest and repayment, etc. at the time, and in fact, the Defendant did not intend to pay the profit by play for the number of days to the same article as the victim promised.

In this regard, the Defendant received 1,350,000 won from the victim's new passbook (Account Number G) in the name of the Defendant on the same day, as well as from around that time to June 25, 2012, the Defendant stated '201.' on the date of crime Nos. 2 through 6 attached to the indictment, which is attached to the indictment from around that time.