If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On June 1, 201, from around 23:00 to 23:40 of the same day, the Defendant and B changed her course from the point of “E” of the victim D operation in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, to the point of “E” of the victim D operation, and on the ground that the employee “I do not sell so due to the breabing of the breab,” the Defendant expressed the employee’s desire to read “this breath,” “I do not sell so due to the breabing of the breath,” and she spathed the displayed bread to the employee who demanded the payment of the breath value, “I will not want to breath,” and she interfere with the above duties of the victim for 40 minutes by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against the defendant or B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning D police statements;

1. Articles 314 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.