Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

At around 10:00 on October 15, 2018, the Defendant was required to remove advertising straws that the Defendant had affixed to each of the doors of the above officetels units before seven months prior to the victim D, who is the co-owner and manager of Suwon Ctel in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, and the co-owner and manager of Suwon-si.

At around 16:00 on the same day, the Defendant visited the above officetels, and removed the CDs by using a knife knife, which is used at the time of ordinary work.

Although the Defendant became aware of the fact that the defects, such as laging off, etc., were severely caused by the removal of the Sticks, the Defendant damaged the victim’s property in order to cover the repair cost of 2,150,00 won by using a knife with a knife with the shoulder attached to the entrance of the boiler room, the instant officetel’s e, F, G, H, I, J,K, L, M, (O, P, Q Q, R, S, T, U, V, M, X, M, Y, Y, Y, Zho, AA, AB, AC, AD, AE, AF, and the boiler door of the boiler room.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Photographs of the damaged entrance;

1. Application of the written estimate for damage;

1. Article 36 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. To reduce the fines for a summary order by taking into account the fact that the defendant for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the initial offender and that an agreement has been reached with the victim;