beta
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2019.10.10 2019가단101791

청구이의

Text

1. The original of a decision on performance recommendation with the executory power to collect funds from the Suwon District Court 2018 Ghana 127035.

Reasons

1. The facts subsequent to the facts of recognition may be found either in dispute between the parties or in Gap evidence Nos. 1-7 (including a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply) by taking into account the overall purport of the pleadings.

The Plaintiff is a person who engages in the business of manufacturing and selling furniture with the trade name of “D.”

B. On August 10, 2018, the Defendant received a payment order (hereinafter “instant payment order”) stating that “E shall pay to the Defendant 2,804,608,264 won and 15% interest per annum from the day following the delivery of the original copy of the payment order to the Defendant,” from the said court, the Defendant filed an application for the payment order for transportation charges with the Chuncheon District Court Branch Branch Branch of 2018 tea3767, which became final and conclusive on August 14, 2018.

C. On September 14, 2018, the Defendant filed an application with the competent court for the attachment and collection order of KRW 10,000,000, out of the transport fee claims against the Plaintiff, as the title of execution for the instant payment order, under the title of execution, with the Suwon District Court: (a) the Defendant applied for the attachment and collection order of KRW 10,00,000 among the transport fee claims against the Plaintiff; and (b) on September 14, 2018, the Defendant received the same decision (hereinafter “instant attachment and collection order”); and (c) this was served on the Plaintiff on September 19,

According to the collection order of this case, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff for the claim for collection amount under the Suwon District Court 2018 Ghana 127035, and on December 19, 2018, the Defendant received a decision on performance recommendation (hereinafter “decision on performance recommendation of this case”) from the above court to the date on which the original copy of the decision on performance recommendation was served on the Defendant from September 22, 2018 to the date on which the original copy of the decision on performance recommendation was served, and 6% per annum from the next day to the date on which the payment was to be made, and 15% per annum from the next day to the date on which the payment was to be made.” This was finalized as is.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The summary of the party’s assertion (1) the remainder of the Plaintiff’s obligation of transportation fee to Plaintiff E remains.