A. The Defendant, with the permission of the victim, used the instant motor vehicle.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the defendant can recognize the fact that the defendant used the motor vehicle of this case without permission from the victim, so the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

B. In full view of all the sentencing conditions in the instant case records and arguments and the fact that the Defendant had the same criminal records as the Defendant, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.