If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

around 07:10 on July 1, 2018, the Defendant called "2018 High 2200, the Defendant, at the Gangnam-gu Seoul building and the Defendant's dwelling space located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul, and the Defendant's dwelling space located in the Defendant's subparagraph C, that the victim D (n, 69 years of age) did not speak of the broken-out of cleaning equipment, and that the Defendant carried the slicker, which is a dangerous object, carried with the Defendant, and died of the snow with the Defendant's snow as the victim's eye."

around 20:30 on June 27, 2018, the Defendant: (a) reported that the victim D (the 69 years of age) in Gangnam-gu Seoul Building B and C (the 69 years of age) used this payment; and (b) the Defendant’s wife on the next side tried to look at the Defendant’s wife on the ground that the Defendant’s wife was “I am in her own, I am in her seat, I am in her seat, I am in her seat, I am in her seat, I am in her seat, I am in her seat, I am in her seat, I am in her seat, I am in her seat, and I am in her part of the victim’s hand who was her son, so I am in her part of the victim’s son who was her part of the son for two weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 High Court 2200"

1. Statements made by witnesses D in the second protocol of the trial;

1. Each investigation report (related to telephone calls from the victim, hearing statements from the victim);

1. Diversary photographs used by the suspect "2018, 2475";

1. Statements made by witnesses D in the second protocol of the trial;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Articles 284, 283(1) (a) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for the crime concerned;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s assertion against the Defendant under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding the provisional payment order and his/her defense counsel is determined. The Defendant is the victim who was the victim of the instant case, where the victim was satisfying and satisfying, and the victim was satisfying.