However, the execution of the above punishment shall be carried out for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendants’ co-principaled with D who committed a traffic accident are placed in the place where the other party should compensate for the damages, and then stolen smartphones in order to prepare them, but they were gathered as a cycle.

At around 01:00 on February 1, 2013, the Defendants: (a) during the coloring of stolen objects at “F” points located in Changwon-si E; (b) during the period between the Defendants and the Defendants, using the gaps in order to dance by the victim G, they cut off the gallonization equivalent to 900,000 won at the market price of the above victim’s possession.

2. Defendants’ co-principal conduct

A. The Defendants, at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (1), stolen the galleno-2, which is equivalent to KRW 1,089,700, the injured party’s galle-no-2, a victim’s galle-no-2, a victim’s galle-no-2, a victim’s galle-no-a-no-a-no-a-no-a-no-a-no

B. The Defendants, at the same time and place as referred to in Paragraph 1, used the gap between the victim I and the victim I in order to dance, and stolen the Defendant A’s galththo 2HD worth KRW 800,000,000, which the Defendant A placed on his customer, into a galtho lus.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Examination of suspect suspect regarding D by the prosecution;

1. A written statement of I, H and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., reflectiveness);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act for suspended execution (Return, etc. of damaged goods);