However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 7, 2014, at around 03:40, the Defendant: (a) taken a passenger in C taxi driven by B as a passenger on April 7, 2014; (b) taken the said taxi on the Jeju East Police Station E box in Jeju, Jeju, with B and Si expenses attached thereto; and (c) taken it into the Jeju Police Station E box in Jeju, with the Defendant arrested B and the police officers

The police officer F of the above police box, the victim, gave the defendant a receipt of taxi expenses and a certificate of non-reported taxi services received from B, and notified the defendant that he could raise a formal objection to the illegal fees, and requested him to return home.

Accordingly, the defendant, while putting the victim's letter B, took a bath, and assaulted the victim's face at one time in drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties for the prevention, suppression, and investigation of the victim's crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the F and G respective Acts and subordinate statutes to the statement;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on probation [Scope of Recommendation] Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act has no basic area (6-1-4 months) of obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1 year and 4 months) (a person specially punished] (a decision of sentence] details of the crime, degree of violence, Defendant’s power to commit a crime, etc., a sentence identical to the order shall