However, with respect to Defendant B, it shall be for 2 years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A, along with a telecommunications-based financial fraud organization to which one-person “D,” etc. belongs, entered a victim’s personal information by having the victim enter the victim’s authorized certificate password andOTP number, etc. by having the victim enter the victim’s personal information in advance a similar Internet website similar to the Financial Supervisory Service’s website. After having transferred money from the victim’s account through Internet banking, Defendant A conspired with each other to commit a crime under the law to withdraw the amount of damage from the transferred account. The means of access recruitment provided the victim’s personal information to transfer money to an unspecified person after acquiring the personal information by telephone with the above contents and transfer money using it. The means of access solicitation provided the victim’s account with the victim’s personal information to transfer money and had the person who would withdraw money from the account, and the Defendant ordered the victim to withdraw money from the account by having the withdrawn money from the account, and the Defendant received the money from the withdrawn money from the account and delivered the money to the withdrawal prior in order.

At around 14:30 on July 25, 2016, the following false statements are made: “I bank security team is one bank security team. It has occurred on the computer screen to normalize the personal identification number and the OTP identification number.” The phone number, password, the authorized certificate number, and the OTP number of the victim are connected to the website of the Financial Supervisory Service opened falsely by the victim.