beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.09.29 2017고단1786

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Seized evidence No. 3 shall be forfeited from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2017. 7. 15. 경 ‘ 위 챗’ 을 통해 보이스 피 싱 조직의 총책인 성명 불상 자로부터 ‘ 보이스 피 싱 현금 수거 책 역할을 해 주면 그 대가를 주겠다.

Upon receipt of the proposal to the effect that “the name omitted person committed the phishing fraud, he received the share of the Defendant from many unspecified victims, who was aware of the fact that he/she committed the phishing fraud, and he/she received the shares of the Defendant from the unspecified number of victims, and told him/her with his/her name omitted boxes in Seoul, etc. from that time.

On August 4, 2017, 2011:11:15, the name-free person introduced himself by phone call to the victim C and introduced himself as the Seoul Central Dental Inspection. "The name-based account was used for a financial crime and many people suffered financial damage.

In order to verify whether money in the current account is related to a crime, the current employee of the Financial Supervisory Service should be sent to the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service, and thus, all the amount of the bank deposit in the current account should be deposited to the employee and delivered to the employee. However, the name in fact was false to the victim for the purpose of dividing the money from the damaged person as the total liability of the singishing organization by taking the money from the injured person to the accomplice of the Defendant.

In order to induce the victim to take a cash account of KRW 19,60,000,000 from the victim, and to move the victim to the vicinity of the river basin in Bupyeongcheon-si, and around that time, the defendant also moved to the above place and ordered the victim to receive the said money from the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendant shows, around August 4, 2017, around 14:55, around 3, 2017, that the victim met the victim and that the victim was a document related to the Financial Supervisory Service. As such, the Defendant’s name cannot be known according to the direction of a person who was unable to receive a 18.4 million won in cash from the victim who was a staff member of the Financial Supervisory Service.