2. The judgment of the court below is based on the fact that the defendant was committed by himself, and the victim C et al. reached an agreement at the court below, the victim C et al. also considering the fact that the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case, such as: (i) the defendant steals the money of the victims who did not proceed with the judicial decision after the judicial decision by the judicial decision by the judicial decision by the judicial decision by the judicial decision by the judicial decision by the judicial decision by the judicial decision by the judicial decision by the judicial decision by the judicial decision by the judicial decision by the judicial decision by the judicial decision by the judicial decision by the judicial decision by the judicial decision by the judicial decision by the judicial decision by the judicial decision by the judicial decision, and (ii) the defendant has the past 20 times of criminal punishment, and (iii) the defendant has the past 20 times of criminal punishment and has the past 4 times of criminal punishment as well as the past thoth of criminal punishment, and thus, it cannot be deemed that the judgment by the court below exceeded the reasonable discretion by the judicial decision.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.