Costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant.

In collusion with C and D, from May 5, 2015 to October 17:00 of the same month, the Defendant paid a charge card for the game of 10,000 won per cash to unspecified customers, and had them conduct the game using the said card, and C set up 39 games in the “sea-to-sea” game that was not rated by the Board of the Game Water Rating Board members, and operated the said game, and D plays the role of “a door door door” which manages customers’ access while viewing the outside of the building. The Defendant provided a charge card for the game of 10,000 won per cash to them while working as the chief of the management department, and then had them conduct the game using the said card, and converted the game into KRW 10,000 per cash acquired by the customer as a result of the game into KRW 10,000.

As a result, the defendant provided ungraded game water in collusion with C and D for use, and exchanged tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game water for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the witness D;

1. Statement of each protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement of each protocol concerning the suspect examination of the police against the accused;

1. Each written statement, each protocol of seizure, list of seizure, investigation report (as to the situation at the time of detection), investigation report (as to the situation at the time of entry into the site), sending details, response to the results of appraisal, investigation report (as to the opposite party of the building), investigation report (as to the results of dispositions against public crimes C and D), and investigation report (as to the results of dispositions against public crimes C

1. Each video of seized articles, on-site photographs, and each CCTV photograph [the defendant asserts to the effect that the defendant's commencement of service in the game of this case as an employee is not on May 5, 2015, but on May 7, 2015.]

The following circumstances, which can be known by the above evidence, i.e., ① the defendant may enter into the C Game Business at the time of the second interrogation of the prosecution.

At the beginning of the date, it is about 5 months.