특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, who was divorced from the victim C (n, 64 years of age) and about 10 years of age, was “D” restaurant operated by the victim C from around 2011 to around 2013, and expressed the disturbance to the victim E (n, 50 years of age) who is an employee of the said restaurant.” As such, the Defendant reported the victim to the police, and thereby received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million from the Incheon District Court to the police, and accordingly, received a notification of the summary order of KRW 1.5 million for three times. As such, the Defendant got the victim E to have a serious mind.
1. On April 11, 2015, the Defendant entered the above "D" restaurant located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City F on April 11, 2015 (Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and interference with business] around 01:00 on April 11, 2015, and the victim E made a desire to “I will pay a fine several times by making a report to the victim E, “I will not pay it, I will not pay it, I will see that I will see it, “I will not pay it, I will see that I will see it soon, I will see it, and if you will see it long, I will not do so).” The Defendant was unable to bring a disturbance over about 1 hour, such as paying time expenses.
Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim E for the purpose of retaliation, and interfered with the victim C's restaurant business by force.
2. Around April 20, 2015, the Defendant entered the place specified in paragraph (1) around 01:00 on April 20, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime (violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Intimidation, etc. on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and interfered with the business of the Defendant, and the victim E was unable to bring a disturbance for about two hours, such as making a payment of a fine several times or more due to the width, not to be taken, and he reported by the NA. The Defendant does not desire to take a criminal figure in relation to the police in relation to all of the police.” “A width is not only a woman but also a woman, and there is no woman.”
Accordingly, the Defendant is retaliationed.