However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Defendant

A From February 15, 1996 to January 18, 201, from around 15, 1996, the president of the victim I Saemaul Bank (hereinafter referred to as “victims Saemaul Bank”) located in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu (hereinafter referred to as “victims Saemaul Bank”) has been in charge of the entire business of the Defendant B, who has been working for the Victim’s Saemaul Bank from March 14, 2002 to March 4, 201, and has been in charge of the entire business of the Defendant B, who has been working for the Victim’s Voluntary Bank as

1. According to the credit business regulations of the victim's treasury in breach of occupational duty, when acquiring a security, a security shall be appraised without delay, and in the case of a commercial building, a loan shall be executed within the limit of 60% of the appraised amount.

In the building and the land of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the maximum debt amount of KRW 6.29 million, and the appraised value of the building of the building of the first building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the

Nevertheless, on August 8, 2006, the Defendants violated the occupational duty of the above credit business regulations to be observed by the victim’s safe, and thus making it difficult to recover loans secured by the K building due to the difficulty in collecting the loans secured by the K building divided, and then sold the building to the general public after selling the building to the general public, the Defendants collected the sales payment to the general public without collecting the credit secured by the senior collateral security.

Accordingly, on August 8, 2006, the Defendants divided the K Building and completed a separate registration, and on 103 among them, the same year.

9. 22. The following year, when the ownership transfer registration based on sale has been made in the name of L on the same day, without going through an appraisal by a certified appraisal agency on the same day, set the right to collateral security of 434 million won with respect to the above 103 days:

9.Around 27.Woo L, the owner of the above heading 103, particular.