2. In full view of the following facts: (a) the Defendant had a large number of records of the judgment; (b) the amount of damage from the instant crime was committed during the repeated period; (c) the amount of damage is relatively less than that of the Defendant; (d) the Defendant did not want the punishment of the Defendant by mutual consent with the victim at the investigation stage; (e) the Defendant was divided in depth and reflects the Defendant’s mistake; and and (e) all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments, the sentence imposed by the lower court

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.