2. In light of the above, a favorable circumstance is recognized, such as the fact that the Defendant led to the confession of each of the crimes of this case and reflects his mistake, that the Defendant appears not to have committed the crime for the purpose of tracking escape or preventing sexual crimes, that the Defendant’s health is not good, that the Defendant’s imprisonment for four months, and that the Defendant was likely to have been an opportunity for self-conscepting, and that the Defendant has faithfully attached an electronic device during the period of electronic device installation and has fulfilled his obligation to comply with the rules.

However, on August 1, 2007, each of the crimes of this case committed by the defendant at the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced five years to imprisonment for the crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and the Protection of Victims (Rape, etc. in Relatives) in the Seoul Southern District Court on December 1, 201, the execution of the punishment has been terminated at the original prison on December 1, 201, and on February 4, 2013, the order to attach an electronic device was issued for three years at the original branch of the Chuncheon District Court on February 4, 2013, but did not arbitrarily separate and charge the portable tracking device during the period of attachment, and accordingly, the crime was not good. The defendant started to stop the crime of this case from the point of time when the period of repeated crime against the above judgment was decided to attach the electronic tracking device from the point of time when it was decided to attach the electronic tracking device to 14 times, and tried to secure the effectiveness of the Act on the Punishment of Specific Crimes from the society.