When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 16:30 on June 11, 2014, the Defendant refused a police officer’s request to suspend the police officer’s movement while obstructing a police officer’s request to stop a police officer’s movement by speaking the police officer “I shall be dismissed..................... the assistant should do the police officer’s movement by blocking the police officer’s body and obstructing the police officer’s movement by blocking the police officer’s movement by carrying the police officer’s hand.”

Accordingly, the above act of the police officers is likely to interfere with the administrative vicarious execution when the defendant's act is close or the police's execution of duty is likely to be committed in a criminal act, and the risk of harm to the life or body of many people is determined as a narrow mountainous district, and the defendant's moving to neighboring places surrounding the police officers so that the defendant does not continue the above interference with the act, and the defendant assaulted D's part of the police officer's kneed to D with the police officer's kneed to kne, and obstructed legitimate execution of duty concerning the prevention of the crime by the police officer's act and the protection of the people's life and body.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Protocol of each police statement concerning E, F, D, and G;

1. Provisions regarding the smuggling of administrative vicarious execution;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the defense counsel’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defense counsel of the defendant in the gist of the argument is at the time of this case.