However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 11, 2015, at around 00:35, the Defendant: (a) requested the head of the police station affiliated with the police box of the police station at the police station where he was dispatched after having been reported the disturbance at the "Cjuk" station B located in Gangwon-gun, to verify his personal information; and (b) upon having arrived at the police box located in the above Party B after getting a patrol boat at the police box located in the police box located in the above Party B, the Defendant took a bath to the above Party E, the police officer, and the police officer, “I am out, spawd, spawd, spathd, and spathd, spawd, spathd, spathd, and spathd, spawd, etc.; and (c) assaulted to the left side of the above Party E to restrain this.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (cognient CD attachment);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1-4 months) [Determination of sentence] [Article 62-2 of the same Act] [Article 62-2 of the same Act] [Article 62-2 of the same Act] [Article 62-2 of the same Act] has no criminal records of a fine or heavier punishment for the last ten years, but there is no such criminal liability as the police officer who spits, spawns, etc. and quis, etc. who are performing official duties under the influence of alcohol