If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Around 00:40 on September 27, 2020 and around 00:0 on September 27, 2020, the Defendant expressed that the victim’s work as the victim C (son, 38 years of age) and the victim’s drinking in the convenience store should not drink, and that the victim’s drinking in the convenience store should not drink, and that the victim expressed the victim’s desire to read “the gue, gue, embar, and gue gue,” and that the victim interfered with the victim’s convenience store business for about 3:40 minutes from around the day to 04:20 on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's work by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Two copies of a photograph of the obstruction of business, four copies of a photograph of the obstruction of business, and four copies of a Kakao Stockholm message to be produced at the convenience store;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on internal investigation reports (related to investigation into business owners and CCTVs);

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;